In Defense of the .25-35.

W. S. Davenport

 

Outdoor Recreation, vol 60, No. 1, January, 1919 pages 103, 121

https://books.google.com/books?id=BX07AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA103&dq=loads+25-35&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi8ipekpOTJAhUBxWMKHSBYBh8Q6AEINTAD#v=onepage&q=loads%2025-35&f=true


THE Savage Company tell me that the .25-35 is not popular and that eventually they will give it up altogether. They have two similar cartridges in the .22 H. P. and the .250-3,000. The .25-35 is not popular, because it is loaded with a two-thirds charge of powder and a long, flat-pointed bullet. It has not got the flat path of the .22, it is not very clean killing for small game and it is a little weak for deer.

The .22 H. P. is the .25-35 reduced at the neck to .22. The .25 can now be loaded to 2,324 f. s. with the 117-grain bullet, but the pressure is a little high for some guns and 2,250 is a safer speed. This load has 1,300 f. p. of energy. The .22 must be driven at 2,900 f. s. to equal that energy. At that speed the bullet may go to pieces on a bone. For shooting deer in the woods at the moderate ranges to which either cartridge is limited for big game, the .25-35-117 is a more reliable load, with a better balance between weight of bullet and speed.

The .22 is at its best for long shots at coyotes and wolves. The factory load has 2,700 f. s. speed. The Du Pont Company tell me that probably the .25-35 can be loaded to 2,800 with the 87-grain bullet. The 25-35-87 is therefore as good as the .22 for these long shots at vermin. For clean killing of small game the .22 loaded to 1,400 f. s. will be very good, but the .25 with the sharp bullet will also be good and it has a better choice of other bullets for more tearing effect in the 25-20 flat point and the Ideal hollow point.

Compared with the .250-3,000 the .25-35 has a longer space for bullets and it will take the long 101-grain spitzer. The shell is neater for light loads. For the hunter who wants to shoot 98 shots out of 100 at small game, with an occasional shot at a deer, the .25-35 is a good cartridge. There is a fairly large class who want just that combination.

The speeds and energies of the .25-35 with the 87, 101 and 117 bullets will be roughly as follows. The speeds were got by deduction and are not exact:

Bullet

87 gr

101 gr

117 gr

 

FPS / Ft/Lb

FPS / Ft/Lb

FPS / Ft/Lb

Muzzle

2,800 / 1,510

2,500 / 1,400

2,250 / 1,310

100 yards

2,460 / 1,170

2,250 / 1,133

1,920 / 950

200 yards

2,150 / 900

2,020 / 913

1,630 / 645

300 yards

l,850 / 660

1,800 / 726

1,380 / 500

500 yards

-

1,400-1,500 / 440-500

-

[ed. the 101 grain spitzer is the only bullet with velocity and energy shown for 500 yards. As the author says, "speeds were got by deduction" so YMMV]


The 87 and 101 grain loads, according to these figures, have about as much energy at 100 yards as the .22 has at the muzzle. The 87 is equal to the .30-30 in power and is ahead of the .32-40 H. P. beyond the muzzle. The trajectory is as flat as the .22 and the shell is the same. The cut of the .22 in the U. M. C. catalogue is really the .25-35 with a sharp bullet. Not much, if any, rechambering would be done in boring the .22 up to the .25.

The loads of No. 16 powder for the 87, 101 and 117 bullets are 29, 27 and 25 grains respectively. The two first are estimates by the Du Pont Company. For 1,400 f. s. they prescribe 8.5 grains of No. 80.

No cartridge excels this in the choice of loads. The hunter can adjust his load to his game and the terrain shot over. In an open country, or for long shots at coyotes the 87-grain will be best. For deer in the woods at 80 to 150 yards the 117 will have shock and will not go to pieces on a bone. For greatest energy the 87 is best for short range, the 101 for long, the two being alike round 200 yards. The 101 will catch up with the .250-3,000 in power round 500 yards. The quick twist of the .25-35 is needed for the 117 bullet at 2,000 f. s. If this bullet is not driven at less than top speed, the twist can be reduced.

The Savage is the only action that will handle the sharp point .25-35. It may be possible to put one cartridge into the tubular magazine. The Savage Company could easily put their .250-3,000 bullet into the .25-35 and give us a seven-pound rifle for it with a 24-inch barrel. These light, sharp, small caliber cartridges are popular in this country, but our two largest factories have only one between them, the .25 Rem. 101. Here is a new one that is useful and does not need a new bullet, shell or action.

The .25-35-101 may prove to be the most useful. I do not know whether the 101 Rem. bullet has a long point, but the Savage 87 built on at the base to 101 will go into the .25-35 shell. The value of "C" should be about half way between the Savage 87 and the Newton 123, or about C = .350. This is the bullet that the designer of the .250-3,000 wanted to use. It has greater staying power than the others. It catches up with those it does not excel at the start. At 200 yards it has the power of the .35 Rem., the .401, the .30-30 and the .32 Sp. with nearly the speed of the .22 at that range and a half more power for the same speed.

I am not advocating more than two loads for any hunter. A slow speed with the 87 or 86 grain and a high power with the 87, 101 or 117. The strong point with this .25-35 is that one has a choice of these high power loads to get the proper mushrooming effect.

The two Savage cartridges lack this adaptability. The .250 was designed to have the maximum powder space possible with the overall length available in the action of the .22 H. P., so the bullet was made short. With these new powders, if the Savage Company were designing the .250 now, they might perhaps shorten the shell to make room for a 100-grain spitzer bullet. It would develop the present speed with the 87 to 3,000 f. 5. Even the thinner .25 Rem. comes near to it. The Du Pont Company have got 2,925 f. s. in the Rem. with only 33,000 pounds of pressure. The longer bullets hold their speed and power better, but there is another equally important advantage in the choice of bullets. These small calibers depend on their mushrooming to kill big game, and require an exact balance between bullet weight and speed to avoid the two extremes of going to pieces without penetration, and penetrating without mushrooming.

The .25-35 might be a little better if the neck were made shorter, but the present neck will take a spitzer point as slender as the 87. The twist might be reduced to one in ten inches with these speedier loads.